#

Comparative studies of EIA review for Papua New Guinean and Icelandic projects with a focus on geothermal utilisation

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor Jarðhitaskóli Háskóla Sameinuðu þjóðanna is
dc.contributor.author Trawen, Brendan is
dc.date.accessioned 2014-12-04T10:52:10Z
dc.date.available 2014-12-04T10:52:10Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.issn 1670-7427
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10802/8626
dc.description Í: Geothermal training in Iceland 2012, s. 823-860 is
dc.description Myndefni: myndir, kort is
dc.description.abstract Geothermal energy resources are abundant and can be utilised in many different ways to benefit society and the people living in it. However, the legal environment has placed legal and regulatory challenges on the progress of geothermal utilisation in many countries. Permit processes and Environment Impact Assessments of geothermal projects are parts of the important regulatory framework that all developers should be subject to before carrying out preparatory work. Well-defined and stable legal and regulatory frameworks are important to geothermal developers to ensure that the planning stages of geothermal development are carried out stepwise for the benefit of a country and to motivate the promotion of geothermal projects. Iceland and Papua New Guinea are countries that operate legal and regulatory frameworks in relation to geothermal development. Both countries have regulations, similar yet different as regards to permissions and EIA processes for geothermal development. Interestingly, Papua New Guinea is new to the geothermal arena and additional geothermal development is likely to take place. Iceland is one of the top geothermal producing countries with several major geothermal power plants. A comparison of legal and regulatory frameworks between the two countries shows both similarities and differences. While the geoscientific and geothermal engineering work may be similar in nature, their regulatory frameworks and preparation of geothermal projects may be compared on the basis of EIA, exploration, permit policies and utilisation. These factors, in turn, provide practical experience and obstacles for Papua New Guinea which is emerging to become a promising country with a geothermal potential of about 3000 MW. Papua New Guinea does not have a regulatory framework for the exploration and development of geothermal energy. Hence, a set-up of a regulatory framework including EIA and permitting processes is proposed. is
dc.format.extent 38 s. is
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher United Nations University is
dc.publisher Orkustofnun is
dc.relation.ispartofseries United Nations University., UNU Geothermal Training Programme, Iceland. Report ; 2012 : 33
dc.relation.uri http://www.os.is/gogn/unu-gtp-report/UNU-GTP-2012-33.pdf
dc.subject Jarðhiti is
dc.subject Umhverfisáhrif is
dc.subject Papúa Nýja-Gínea is
dc.subject Ísland is
dc.title Comparative studies of EIA review for Papua New Guinean and Icelandic projects with a focus on geothermal utilisation en
dc.title.alternative Geothermal training in Iceland en
dc.type Bók is
dc.identifier.gegnir 991003331919706886


Skrár

Skrá Stærð Skráartegund Skoða Lýsing
UNU-GTP-2012-33.pdf 2.749Mb PDF Skoða/Opna Heildartexti

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi flokki:

Skoða venjulega færslu

Leita


Fletta