#

Comparison of two different approaches for a geothermal heating system

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor Jarðhitaskóli Háskóla Sameinuðu þjóðanna is
dc.contributor.author Fenglan, Cao is
dc.date.accessioned 2014-09-02T08:40:56Z
dc.date.available 2014-09-02T08:40:56Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.issn 1670-7427
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10802/6675
dc.description Í : Geothermal training in Iceland 2008, s. 101-124 is
dc.description Myndefni: gröf, töflur is
dc.description.abstract This project compares two different design approaches for achieving a geothermal district heating system in Huang Hua city, HeBei province. The Jinxiuhuacheng building project, with a heat load of 4.6 MW for more than 116,000 m2, has been used to assess these design approaches. This project presents the specificity of having buildings heated with only floor-heating or with only radiators grouped together and located nearby the heat central. The first design approach is based on the traditional Chinese way with two distribution systems in the heat central. Hot water is produced via heat exchangers connected in series, using return water from the radiators heat exchanger as supply water for production of floor-heating hot water. In this case, radiators are designed for 65/50°C supply/return temperatures and floor heating for 45/35°C. The other design approach has only one distribution system carrying supply water produced at 70°C via one heat exchanger at the heat central. Radiators are designed for 70/35°C supply/return temperatures. Floor-heating, requiring lower supply temperature, is directly connected to the supply pipelines and equipped with mixing devices to mix (cold) return water to the district heating supply water. Results of the assessment are discussed in three parts, the production system, the distribution system and the space heating system. Finally, an economic analysis of the two different approaches is made. The main conclusions are that the new approach allows simplification of the control system, reduces the distribution system cost and yearly operational cost. On the other hand it increases the indoor system investment cost. On the whole, it seems to be more economical, with more attractive and space efficient radiators. In addition, it can supply good quality domestic hot water heating. is
dc.format.extent 24 s. is
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher United Nations University is
dc.publisher Orkustofnun is
dc.relation.ispartofseries United Nations University., UNU Geothermal Training Programme, Iceland. Report ; 2008-12
dc.relation.uri http://www.os.is/gogn/unu-gtp-report/UNU-GTP-2008-12.pdf
dc.subject Jarðhiti is
dc.subject Hitaveitur is
dc.subject Kína is
dc.title Comparison of two different approaches for a geothermal heating system en
dc.title.alternative Geothermal training in Iceland en
dc.type Bók is
dc.identifier.gegnir 991008184569706886


Skrár

Skrá Stærð Skráartegund Skoða
UNU-GTP-2008-12.pdf 1.056Mb PDF Skoða/Opna

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi flokki:

Skoða venjulega færslu

Leita


Fletta