#

Comparison and selection of a steam gathering system in Ulubelu geothermal project, Sumatera, Indonesia

Skoða fulla færslu

Titill: Comparison and selection of a steam gathering system in Ulubelu geothermal project, Sumatera, IndonesiaComparison and selection of a steam gathering system in Ulubelu geothermal project, Sumatera, Indonesia
Höfundur: Purwono, A. Novi ; Novi Purwono, A. ; Jarðhitaskóli Háskóla Sameinuðu þjóðanna
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10802/23888
Útgefandi: United Nations University; Orkustofnun
Útgáfa: 2011
Ritröð: United Nations University., UNU Geothermal Training Programme, Iceland. Report ; 2010 : 26
Efnisorð: Jarðhiti; Indónesía
ISSN: 1670-7427
Tungumál: Enska
Tengd vefsíðuslóð: http://www.os.is/gogn/unu-gtp-report/UNU-GTP-2010-26.pdf
Tegund: Bók
Gegnir ID: 991010607219706886
Athugasemdir: Í: Geothermal training in Iceland 2010, bls. 525-562Myndefni: myndir, gröf, töflur.
Útdráttur: This study focuses on the conceptual design of geothermal pipelines, especially for steam gathering systems. A tool for calculating a pipeline system was developed which emphasizes the comparison and selection of a pipeline system for transmitting geothermal fluids, with respect to optimal design and costs. Certainly it is related to the behaviour of fluid flow in a pipeline system. The calculation compares three different conceptual systems of geothermal fluid transmission: single-phase flow, two-phase flow and a combination of both systems (hybrid). It also compares fluid transmission using a single pipe and two parallel pipes. A case study is made of a steam gathering system for the Ulubelu geothermal project 2×55 MW, units 1 and 2, the high-temperature geothermal area under development in Indonesia by PT. Pertamina Geothermal Energy. The results show that the three studied systems give a similar design and costs for this project, but the hybrid system would be most efficient with regard to the characteristics of the existing project site. Generally, a single-pipe transmission is more economical than two parallel pipes. There was an insignificant difference in pipe diameter between the designs.


Skrár

Skrá Stærð Skráartegund Skoða Lýsing
UNU-GTP-2010-26.pdf 4.424Mb PDF Skoða/Opna Heildartexti

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi flokki:

Skoða fulla færslu

Leita


Fletta