#

Resistivity methods - DC and TEM with examples and comparison from the Reykjanes penisula and Öxarfjörður, Iceland

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor KenGen is
dc.contributor Geothermal Development Company Ltd. is
dc.contributor Jarðhitaskóli Háskóla Sameinuðu þjóðanna is
dc.contributor United Nations University is
dc.contributor United Nations University, Geothermal Training Programme is
dc.contributor.author Lúðvík S. Georgsson 1949 is
dc.contributor.author Ragna Karlsdóttir 1946 is
dc.date.accessioned 2017-12-07T10:55:36Z
dc.date.available 2017-12-07T10:55:36Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.issn 1670-794x
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10802/13923
dc.description Presented at SDG Short Course I on Exploration and Development of Geothermal Resources, organized by UNU-GTP, GDC and KenGen, at Lake Bogoria and Lake Naivasha, Kenya, Nov. 10-31, 2016. is
dc.description.abstract Resistivity methods have for a long time been proven as the most successful method in geothermal exploration, due to the resistivity of rocks in geothermal environment being chiefly controlled by parameters that correlate to the geothermal activity. The most important method for measuring the resistivity in the uppermost kilometre was for a long time the DC resistivity method, especially with the Schlumberger configuration. It was in the 1990’s replaced by the TEM method, more specifically the central loop TEM sounding method, as the routine method for the exploring the uppermost kilometre. Description is given of both methods and their differences discussed. Then examples are taken from two geothermal areas in Iceland, the outer Reykjanes Peninsula and the Öxarfjördur area, where surveys using both methods have been done. The results are discussed and conclusions drawn that confirm the advantage of TEM over the DC method. is
dc.format.extent 1 rafrænt gagn (15 bls.). is
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher United Nations University is
dc.relation.ispartof 991008983279706886
dc.relation.ispartofseries United Nations University., UNU Geothermal Training Programme, Iceland. Short Course ; SC-23
dc.relation.uri http://os.is/gogn/unu-gtp-sc/UNU-GTP-SC-23-0303.pdf
dc.subject Jarðhiti is
dc.subject Jarðhitaleit is
dc.subject Reykjanes is
dc.subject Öxarfjörður is
dc.title Resistivity methods - DC and TEM with examples and comparison from the Reykjanes penisula and Öxarfjörður, Iceland en
dc.type Tímaritsgrein is
dc.identifier.gegnir 991008995609706886


Skrár

Skrá Stærð Skráartegund Skoða Lýsing
UNU-GTP-SC-23-0303.pdf 1.272Mb PDF Skoða/Opna Heildartexti

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi flokki:

Skoða venjulega færslu

Leita


Fletta